Friday, February 05, 2010

Splash du Jour: Friday

In any case, I find something repulsive about the idea of vicarious redemption. I would not throw my numberless sins onto a scapegoat and expect them to pass from me; we rightly sneer at the barbaric societies that practice this unpleasantness in its literal form. There's no moral value in the vicarious gesture anyway. As Thomas Paine pointed out, you may if you wish take on another man's debt, or even take his place in prison. That would be self-sacrificing. But you may not assume his actual crimes as if they were your own; for one thing you did not commit them and might have died rather than do so; for another this impossible action would rob him of individual responsibility. So the whole apparatus of absolution and forgiveness strikes me as positively immoral, while the concept of revealed truth degrades the concept of free intelligence by purportedly relieving us of the hard task of working out the ethical principles for ourselves.
-- Christopher Hitchens --


Have a great Friday!
*******

1 comment:

  1. Yes. From this quote it's not hard to see that people understand their sin without our help.

    It's Grace they need help understanding.

    (Not many Christians get this.)

    ReplyDelete

Thank you for your words!